Subject : Gaguang Community |
Duoptang@yahoo.com
Fictional thinking cannot be possible to realise: Acritique
of uncle John Jock Kang's letter addressed to Guang community.
In his recent letter that is addressed to Guang community, uncle John Jock discussed other things,
one a claim that "if Nyang Kiir
wants to go back to his step-brother Thiang Kiir(Gajaak in his general language) who was of course, his
father by Nuer traditions, then Kuan
Jiok( ciee-nyegiy a
sub-clan of Gaguang) would go back to Jiok and jion his brother Bulbeeck. He boldly concluded his remarks. The second point
our uncle mentioned in his letter is what he again called "Gaguang in dilemma about their creation". What does
our uncle mean when he comes up with this horrific view? Third, our uncle used
a metaphorical language saying that talking about Gaguang
community we seem to play ball without a goalkeeper. And then
rushed on to cite an example on Gajaak as of the
largest Kirr's son in "population wide"
indicating that it is impossible for Gaguang to exist
without their counterparts Jiok.
Four, our uncle has mentioned that Gaguang
are found in two countries namely(Ethiopia & the Sudan)that if Gaguang on Ethiopian side of the border talk about their
unity, that is entire their matter of concern and not those on the Sudanese
side of the border he remarked. Fifth, he said that talking about Gaguang "departing" from their brother Jiok would mean an aggravation of the conflict Between Jiok and Guang Kiir. And lastly , uncle
elaborated a relationship between Jiok and Guang with specific reference to Gaguang
being always side by side with Yoal Khena. Based on the article he posted on website, I have
nevertheless managed to critically analyze and interpret the theme of the very
delicate entire story he presented as follows:
First of all, as I read the letter, it really gave me a
hectic time to grasp and understand the intentions and the motives behind our
uncle to come up with thisissue putting a green light
between his communities(Guang
& Jiok communities). After quite a while I
managed to understand his intention. That is, he is an advocate of Pal GatKuoth's straight-jacket philosophy. His articale told us that he is among those very few
individuals who hand-pciked Pal to lead NCA with the
objective of undermining of Gaguang's one of. In
addition to, I may say that he did not fully internaliz
the reason why all Gaguang sons and duaghter either in Diaspora and in
I wonder why our uncle is moved up to that extent. He is one
of the few pioneers in education in the entire
Referring to what he called Nyang " going back to his step-brother and father Thiang, and Kuan going back to
his brother Bulbeeck or Jiok
in general. This I would personally say is the main objective of Pal's campaign
in our community and that predisposition, I hope and
indeed believe would not be tolerated by both Jiok
and Guang communities who want to discuss their
differences in a round table dialogue. Second, referring to historical back
ground, past cannot have any ground on the present sitautions.
Well, let us suppose that it be traced back; can this analogy be applied here
in our context? I regretted, if our uncle is in a position that Kuan Jiok should go back to Bulbeeck as his brother, what about Chiak(Gaatciika,
sub-clan of Gaguang) who is step-brother of Kuan, where he is going to place him? Because both are
brothers forming what is now called Cie-Nyewany or Nyewany family line. If he says so, then our uncle is
creating a division between Cie-Nyewany themselves as
brothers. In addition to this, during historical, political, and geographical
move which was made in 1981, or so, by D.K Matthews, which led to formation of Maiwut as one of the districts in Upper Nile, why Bulbeeck did not claim his brother Kuan
Jiok to remain with him? meanwhile,
all Gaguaang along with Yoal
khena were taken to Maiwut.
I want to tell our uncle that no Kuan sons and
daughters who can advocate this idea; if any few, are those whom I can term as
"misled ones" by Pal him himself.
Why our uncle did not present this claim of Kuan going back to Bulbeck by
then? I think our uncle is making mere and wild speculations. Moreover, is that
idea paused by our uncle shared by all Cie-Nyegiy
sons and daughters(descendeants
of Kuan)? I do no really think that it is a common
view. It is only Pal Gatkuoth and a few individuals
from community whom I may termed as the misled ones by Pal that may have
damaging sentiment.
If our uncle thinks that way, can Cie-Nyegiy(Kuan
descents) down at the grass root level of the community accept that opinion? Let alone CIAK. Who is it among Gaguaang
sub-clans always becoming the victims of the conflicts between them and their
brother Jiok? Is it not Kuan
whom our uncle claims to repossess? I am quite optimistic that this cannot happen
and will not happen in some times to come under any circumstances. We believe
that this is one of the evil seeds, which our uncle is trying to sow among his
communities, and that I think our uncle wishes may give a room to Pal who is
relentlessly fighting to blind fool some of our brothers to dark side of the
room where he is in. That is next to impossible, Guang
has an indomitable spirit that majority of them cannot be easily blown up by
directionless and unfiltered winds; I would like to remind our uncle. Is our
uncle aware of how sitautions down at the grass root lvel of the communities between two brothers are going on?
If he wants to take Kuan, let him come to
To tell you that Pal is the one who sows the hatred seeds
among Guang and Jiok
communities. For example, he said that Gaguang should
appreciate him because he divided Gajiok into two
opposing camps. A point he said has never been done by any NUER in the history;
and our communities have beev in series of communal
conflict from day one until today. What Pal's leadership has done to stop such
needless conflicts as a leader in both communities? I think none of us can
claim any contribution made by that leadership, rather Pal himself has
contributed a big sum of money " THOOR-JIKANY"
a movement working for the destruction in our areas that that money goes to the
movement's leader.
The second point, our uncle himself was educated, worked in
Lastly, our uncle in his article talked about " Playing
a ball without goal keeper" Does he mean that it is next to impossible for
Gaguang to ever depart from Jiok?
Or he means that Gaguang are few to determine their
fate and live without Gajiook(theirbrothers)? All things can be
happen if people want them to be so, but this point should not be the case in
our views. I think what our uncle mentioned in the second paragraph of his
article is a complete gesture of naivety. There is no
political interventions made by Gaguang on the
Ethiopian border into the political affairs of their brothers on the Sudanese
side. We know the political demakartion, I think our unlce is in political wildness to thinkthat
way. Why does he think that Gaguang(those in the Sudanese side) when they are a part and parcel
of the entire
In conclusion, I would say that all what he said not
represent the opinion of all Jiook educated elites
and as such that is a wish thinking of an individual. Pal is not recognized in
our community as a leader of Nasir community, but Koang
Gatkuoth who legitimate leader of NCA and who sees
that the community is above is every one. This view shared by all Gaguang both in
Thank you all in advance, Guaang
community.